Some fabulous IAFL keynotes coming up!

IAFL keynote speakersThe IAFL 2019 Conference will include a thought-provoking and engaging programme of keynote presentations representing academic scholarship, professional legal and language practice, law enforcement and the judiciary on the International Association of Forensic Linguists conference theme of Access to Justice through Language. I’m proud to say I’ll be one of them!>>   Read more now

International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) – Melbourne 5-9 Aug

This year, the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) will be held in Melbourne, 5-9 August 2019. As well as many other interesting topics, there is a section on forensic phonetics. I’ll be there! It is too late to submit an abstract, but please consider joining us for one of the biggest phonetics conferences in the world.>>   Read more now

Want to participate in forensic experiments?

I am planning a series of new experiments on perception of indistinct forensic audio. It would be great to have a list of potential participants. If you are willing to help, please contact me. Don’t worry you will not be committing to anything, and you can opt out at any time. Below are answers to a few questions you might have – if you have another question, feel free to contact me and I will respond directly.


  • Experiments typically take around 10-20 minutes and involve listening to short segments of indistinct audio under various conditions, and answering questions about what you hear.
  • Participants generally rate experiments as interesting or very interesting.
  • You can remain completely anonymous if you wish.
  • You can always easily opt out of any experiment at any stage.
  • Most experiments ask you not to discuss your responses with anyone who has not already done the experiment.
  • To participate, you just need a standard computer or modern device, a quiet space, and headphones if you have them.
  • >>   Read more now

    New podcast on forensic transcription by the Macquarie Dictionary team

    Check out the Macquarie Dictionary podcast (especially Episode #22!)
    Did you know the Macquarie Dictionary has a podcast? It is called Word for Word, produced by Kate Sherington for Macquarie Dictionary and Pan Macmillan Australia – and it is excellent! They recently published Episode #22 featuring yours truly – and you’ll never guess what it is about…

    Forensic Linguistics – Crime and Punishment

    When it comes to bugging a suspect, re-interpreting a dusty statute, or presenting evidence in a criminal trial, the shifting tides of language draw the law with them. In this episode, forensic linguist Helen Fraser tests our ear-witness fallibility with speech evidence from a real-life murder case. Plus, the Macquarie team remembers that time they had to investigate a ransom note. Join us as we explore our language: the ways we use it, the ways we abuse it, and the ways we ultimately change it.
    The episode is about much more than just forensic transcription, and features a lot more interviewees than just me, so it is well worth listening to even if you are already an FT buff. Plus Kate gives her own new and very entertaining, while still serious, twist to the topic of forensic transcription. Among other interesting tidbits, she makes mention of a series of 10 podcasts called Black Hands – which tells the story of the 1994 murder of David Bain’s family, in Dunedin, New Zealand. David Bain is the voice in the famous forensic transcription demo video that features on our front page (if you haven’t checked it out – please do so now: it is just 90 seconds and most people find it mind-boggling). Black Hands is produced by

    Martin Van Beynan>>   Read more now

    Tutorial on forensic transcription Tues 4 Dec 2018, Sydney

    Coogee Beach, Sydney: venue for SST 2018

    I will be running a half-day tutorial on Forensic Transcription on Tuesday 4th December as part of the Tutorial Day preceding the Speech Science and Technology conference hosted by ASSTA and UNSW, and held in Coogee (a beachside suburb of Sydney). It will be possible to register for the tutorial day only – or of course you can stay and enjoy the full conference, which has some great keynote speakers.>>   Read more now

    My take on the laurel-yanny phenomenon

    Laurel and Hardy – until recently the most famous comedy duo involving someone called Laurel (their Wikipedia entry)

    Well there has certainly been a lot of publicity for the laurel/yanny clip recently. It is great to have so many people discussing speech and speech perception – but also a little disheartening that so much misinformation gets accepted as valid phonetics.>>   Read more now

    Legal precedent based on false beliefs proves hard to overturn

    New article in The Conversation

    Legal precedent based on false beliefs proves hard to overturn

    Judges consider their profession to be among the most accountable of those whose opinions and actions shape our society – but what happens when they make a mistake in their judgments? After all – judges are only human: mistakes must happen, however rarely.>>   Read more now

    Two new papers

    Two new academic papers give detailed background on the legal and linguistic issues behind the problems with the use of covert recordings as evidence in criminal trials that are canvassed on this site.>>   Read more now

    Plenary session at the Australian Academy of Forensic Sciences

    Covert recordings as evidence in criminal trials

    Problems and solutions from the perspective of forensic phonetics

    SPEAKER: Dr Helen Fraser

    Summary: Covert recordings are collected during investigation of most major crimes, providing vital intelligence to detectives. Some are also used as forensic evidence in court: it is here that major problems can arise. Covert recordings are often very indistinct, and can easily be misinterpreted. In one colourful example, ‘he died after wank off’ was shown to be a mishearing of ‘he died after one cough’ (French and Stevens 2006). Over the past thirty years, the law has developed practices intended to overcome anomalies like this, and ensure juries reach a reliable interpretation of what is said, and who says it, in forensic audio.>>   Read more now

    A call to action: Australian linguists call on the judiciary to reform practices for using covert recordings as evidence in court

    Recent meetings of the Australian Linguistic Society (ALS) and the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (ALAA) voted unanimously to send a Call to Action to the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration (AIJA), asking them to facilitate review and reform of current practices for admission and use of covert recordings as evidence in criminal trials.>>   Read more now

    Randy Newman: Can he or can’t he?

    Here’s a short snippet of audio which people hear in different ways.

    What do you think – does he say ‘I can’ or ‘I can’t’?

    Why not take a straw poll of your friends and colleagues to see what they think – then read on for a scientific perspective!>>   Read more now

    Translators and covert recordings

    Many covert recordings contain speech in languages other than English. How should this be presented to the jury? Obviously simply providing a transcript is not enough. The speech needs to be translated into English to enable the court to understand what is going on. The process is called forensic translation.>>   Read more now

    New BBC Radio 4 show about forensic phonetics

    Impressionist Rory Bremner explores the role of the human voice in forensic phonetics.

    Forensic phonetics – or voice identification – has long been used in legal proceedings to help determine if the voice on a recording is that of the defendant. But with the electronic age enabling the recording and storage of more data than ever before, its role in criminal investigations is changing rapidly and the race is on to “fingerprint the human voice”.>>   Read more now

    ‘Assisting’ listeners to hear words that aren’t there: dangers in using police transcripts of indistinct covert recordings

    ABSTRACT Results are reported of a new experiment using an indistinct covert recording from a real murder trial, along with the police transcript admitted to ‘assist’ the court to hear its contents. Previous research using the same material has shown that the police transcript is inaccurate, yet nevertheless highly influential on the perception of listeners ‘primed’ by seeing words it suggests. The current experiment examines the effects of priming participants with a made-up phrase that vaguely fits the acoustics of one section of the recording. Results indicate that a very high proportion of listeners are easily ‘assisted’ to ‘hear’ the made-up phrase. Discussion argues that audio of this quality should only be used as evidence if accompanied by a reliable independent transcript.>>   Read more now

    Real forensic experts should pay more attention to the dangers posed by ‘ad hoc experts’

    ABSTRACT Recent years have seen a great deal of attention given to the reliability of expert evidence admitted in criminal trials. However, almost no attention has been given to the reliability of evidence provided by so-called ‘ad hoc experts’. Indeed, many forensic scientists seem unaware that such a category of witness even exists, much less of the substantial threats they pose to the fairness of our criminal justice system. ‘Ad hoc experts’ are used for a number of evidence types. Here, we concentrate on one type that appears in Australian courts on a weekly basis: interpretation of indistinct covert recordings. The aim is to draw the attention of AJFS readers to serious problems in the handling of this much-used form of evidence, in the hope that the AAFS might develop a position on the issues and support calls for reform of practice.>>   Read more now

    What can be done about wrongful convictions?

    The difficulty of providing fresh evidence of wrongful conviction that emerges after the trial and associated appeals have been concluded is discussed at this interesting but troubling event hosted by Sydney University:>>   Read more now

    An important development from the UK

    PostNoteCoverHere’s a new Research Briefing commissioned by the UK Parliament, bringing a welcome note of caution to the use of Forensic Linguistics and Phonetics evidence across a range of disciplines.>>   Read more now

    An explosive murder confession – or a dodgy transcription?

    17 March 2015

    Listen to these two snippets of muttered self-talk, then read on to see how a transcript can prime journalists’ perception.

    If you are among the few who have not already heard the media’s interpretation of this audio, you’ll find it useful if you write down what you hear now, before reading on – and if you have a moment, I would love to be told your perception – you can send a message here.>>   Read more now

    Christopher Pyne: the c-word or the g-word?

    16 May 2014

    Social media claims Christopher Pyne dropped the ‘C’ word in parliament on Wednesday, but he says the word was ‘grub’. (SMH)

    Huge interest the last day or two here in Oz as to whether Christopher Pyne, a right-wing politician, swore at a fellow politician in parliament.>>   Read more now

    What did Oscar Pistorius really say?

    10 April 2014

    With so many responding to media invitations to form subjective opinions as to whether Oscar Pistorius’ emotion is genuine, are we missing factual errors in the reporting of what he is actually saying? Could scientific analysis help here?>>   Read more now

    George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin: Judge orders voice testimony to be excluded

    23 June 2013

    The Zimmerman ruling

    A ruling has been handed down on the voice evidence in the Zimmerman case we have been following. Judge Debra S Nelson gave high praise for Prof Peter French’s evidence (in her words, ‘The Court found the testimony of Dr. French to be the most compelling of the witnesses presented.‘). That is an important endorsement for the role of genuine expertise in relevant branches of phonetics in the legal system.>>   Read more now

    George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin: Can the voice evidence identify the speaker?

    12 June 2013

    An ongoing murder case in Florida, USA is discussing the vexed issue of whether it is possible to identify a speaker from a tiny, barely intelligible ‘grab’ of poor quality audio. One of the issues is the extent to which speaker comparison depends on prior decisions about what is being said (i.e. forensic transcription). The USA is very open about their court proceedings, so we are able to follow along with the debate. In this post you can hear the audio, and then (preferably in that order) read about case and listen to the expert testimony.>>   Read more now

    NSW Law Reform Commission recommends continued use of police transcripts

    3 April 2013

    The New South Wales Law Reform Commission has just released its Report 136 on Jury Directions. Although not explicitly mentioned in its terms of reference, the report takes the opportunity in Section 6.5 (pages 123ff) to reinforce the current practices regarding presentation of hard-to-hear covert recordings. That is rather disappointing in view of the significant problems with this area of the law that have been pointed out by phonetic science.>>   Read more now

    The PACT experiments

    The PACT experiments represent a more commonplace – and more disturbing – problem with the treatment of forensic transcription than the crisis call experiment. Again they use audio from a real murder trial. If you have read the case study, you’ll recognise this story. Here we go into a bit more detail on the experimental results than in the case study itself.>>   Read more now

    The crisis call experiment

    Here’s an experiment shows the dangers of leaving the task of evaluating the transcript of a ‘disputed utterance’ to the jury.

    The story

    Early one morning, a young man returned home from his paper round. About twenty minutes later, he made a crisis call (emergency call) reporting his entire family were lying dead in the house.>>   Read more now